News
Trump Backtracks on Harvard Foreign Student Policy: What It Means for Int’l Students
READ ALSO: Trump’s Digital Coin Unlocking: What You Need to Know About the $300 Million Sale
What Was the Policy?
On July 6, 2020, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that international students taking only online classes would no longer be allowed to stay in the U.S. This sparked widespread outrage, as many top universities—including Harvard and MIT—had already planned for online instruction due to the coronavirus.The policy
Barred F-1 and M-1 visa students from staying in the U.S. if all classes were online. Required students to transfer to in-person programs or face deportation. Affected over 1 million international students, a significant portion of whom contribute billions to the U.S. economy. Legal Battle: Harvard and MIT Sue Trump Administration Harvard and MIT filed a lawsuit in federal court, arguing that the policy was arbitrary and capricious and put the health and safety of students at risk. They were joined by:- 17 states and the District of Columbia
- Dozens of colleges and universities
- Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Microsoft
The Reversal: Trump Administration Retreats
On July 14, 2020, just hours before the first court hearing, the Trump administration backed down. A federal judge in Boston announced that the government had agreed to rescind the directive and return to the March 2020 guidance, which allowed flexibility for international students during the pandemic. This decision:- Restored student visa protections for online learners
- Allowed students to remain in the U.S. even if their schools go fully online
- Avoided major disruptions in university operations and student lives
- Continued access to education without the risk of deportation
- Stability during ongoing global uncertainty
- Recognition of the value that foreign students bring to the U.S. economy and academic system
- Reduced university revenues
- Weakened innovation ecosystems
- Strained U.S.-foreign diplomatic relations
READ ALSO: Tech Billionaires Buy D.C. Mansions to Get Closer to the White House
Reactions from Academia and Beyond
Harvard President Lawrence Bacow praised the outcome, saying it reflects “a recognition that the rule was ill-conceived and deeply unfair.” University communities and civil liberties advocates hailed it as a win for justice, common sense, and global education. While the Trump administration’s attempt to restrict international student access was swiftly challenged and overturned, it reflects a broader trend in the Trump-era immigration policy. This episode highlights the importance of collective legal and institutional resistance in upholding the rights of foreign nationals in America. Universities and students must remain alert, as immigration regulations may continue to evolve with political shifts and public health challenges.READ ALSO: Why More Black Americans are Turning to the Republican Party
Discover more from Jojo Naija
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Continue Reading